But when the tables are turned, sceptics turn turncoat as well to be able to re-enforce their already-minds-made-up mindset. That is, eyewitness testimony that converts a UFO sighting into an unexplained bona fide UFO case, even if only about 5% almost daily, well then clearly the eyewitness testimony counts for nothing with regard to bona fide evidence.

I make one defense but also for the UFO ETH considering scientists counter that each one of the threads that an extraterrestrial learning ability having been then or now on earth are weak-in-the-knees when it comes to solid evidence? Roswell is weak; UFO abduction circumstances are weak; the UFO conspiracy or cover-up case is usually weak; UFO photographs together with videos are weak; UFO radar instances are weak; the case for Erich von Daniken's ancient astronauts is weak; that ghost rocket sightings (1946) are generally weak; contactee claims are specially weak; UFO eye-witness reports are unreliable, etc. But, put them (and much more besides) all together and like all superior detective stories combine/integrate the many clues into one grp composite whole (after separating out the wheat from the chaff and eliminating the red herrings) than the whole is more than the sum of the parts. You purchase a fairly consistent pattern which emerges; not the radio transmission patter-of-little-dots-and-dashes the SETI scientist wants but a nuts-and-bolts in addition to a here-and-now pattern.

Now admittedly anybody of a hundred several and independent threads might in itself be not all that convincing, but then all 100 possibly even threads are woven together - that's a better duck of another colour. It's like if it seems like a duck - it may not be a duck. If it flies like a duck - it are probably not a duck. If it walks like a duck - it may not be a duck. If it swims being a duck - it may not be a duck. If it quacks like a duck - it may not be a duck. But if it looks, flies, moves, swims and quacks being a duck - then it's a duck!

This Evidence

What's the final evidence for UFOs together with by extension the UFO ETH? Well, you have multi-tens of 1000s of UFO sightings, probably six figures worth likelihood is, many multi-witness sightings, more than a few multi-independent multi-witness sightings; sightings by people useful to the outdoors and aerial phenomena (such as pilots), films and photographs that contain defied the best experts to describe them in conventional terminology, radar returns, physical floor traces, physiological effects on biological tissues, including people; often more than one of these categories applies per incident.

You have a global phenomena, where areas from Australia, the NORTH AMERICAN, Canada, the United Empire, Spain, Belgium, France, Russia, Mexico, etc. have devoted considerable resources to finding answers to what many see for a 'silly season' filler which has a high 'giggle' factor. That little logical sense - the 'giggle' factor, not the official investigations. There are nor psychological, sociological or cultural reasons to explain the origin of UFOs typically, nor specific UFO reports. It's all evidence, and grist for the mill. Paranormal ghosts, Paranormal ghosts, Paranormal news